{"id":38032,"date":"2025-12-20T00:52:21","date_gmt":"2025-12-20T00:52:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gpnewswire.com\/news\/the-mystery-of-the-blob-mintmark-on-the-1913-s-indian-head-half-eagle\/"},"modified":"2025-12-20T00:52:21","modified_gmt":"2025-12-20T00:52:21","slug":"the-mystery-of-the-blob-mintmark-on-the-1913-s-indian-head-half-eagle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gpnewswire.com\/news\/the-mystery-of-the-blob-mintmark-on-the-1913-s-indian-head-half-eagle\/","title":{"rendered":"The Mystery of the \u201cBlob\u201d Mintmark on the 1913-S Indian Head Half Eagle"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>By <strong>Roger W. Burdette<\/strong> for<\/em> <span><a href=\"https:\/\/coinweek.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>CoinWeek<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Collectors of Indian Head half eagles cherish a quintet of San Francisco Mint coins for their overall rarity. These issues include the 1909-S, 1910-S, 1911-S, 1912-S, and 1913-S.<\/p>\n<p>The San Francisco Mint struck all five dates in limited quantities and promptly issued them to California and other West Coast states.<\/p>\n<h3>A Rare San Francisco Quintet<\/h3>\n<p>Within this group, the 1913-S half eagle stands out as unusually rare in Mint State 63, and collectors consider it almost unobtainable in MS 65 or MS 66.<\/p>\n<figure aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-236935\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-236935\" src=\"https:\/\/coinweek.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/1913-S_half_eagle.webp\" alt='1913-S Indian Head Half Eagle with \"Blob\" Mintmark' width=\"1201\" height=\"601\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">1913-S Indian Head Half Eagle with \u201cBlob\u201d Mintmark<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3>The 1913-S Half Eagle in High Grades<\/h3>\n<p>In 1988, <strong>David Akers<\/strong> commented on the peculiar quality of this issue:<\/p>\n<p><span><em>\u201cThe strike is typically only average to good and the mintmark is usually very weak, and little more than a shapeless \u2018blob.\u2019 Problems near the border indicate die deterioration\u2026and the luster is nearly always sub-par.\u201d<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Since then, most observers have shared this assessment. For example, top-tier auction descriptions frequently address the mintmark directly, as illustrated by this Heritage Auctions description:<\/p>\n<p><em><span>\u201cAlthough the mintmark is a trifle weak on this specimen, it is still completely visible and actually looks like an S, rather than the usual blob of metal seen on most specimens. The strike is substantially sharper than usual for the issue.\u201d<\/span><\/em><strong>[1]<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3>The Origin of the \u201cBlob\u201d Description<\/h3>\n<p>Accordingly, Akers, the Heritage cataloger, and many others have used the \u201cblob\u201d epithet to describe the mintmark on many 1913-S half eagles. The reason for this characterization appears clearly in the illustrations below, which show a sharply defined mintmark, two examples of a blob, and a more extreme \u201cshapeless blob.\u201d<\/p>\n<figure aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-236936\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-236936 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/coinweek.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/details_mintmark.webp\" alt=\"1913-S Half Eagle Mintmarks , two examples of a blob, and a more extreme \u201cshapeless blob, and a sharply defined mintmark\" width=\"620\" height=\"120\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>1913-S Indian Head Half Eagle Mintmark Details<\/strong> <span>[left to right]- Two examples of a \u201cblob\u201d, a more extreme \u201cshapeless blob\u201d , then a sharply defined mintmark.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3>The Die Deterioration Theory\u2014and Its Limits<\/h3>\n<p>Based on Akers\u2019 comment that <span><em>\u201cproblems near the border indicate die deterioration,\u201d<\/em><\/span> collectors initially accepted this explanation as reasonable.<\/p>\n<p>However, closer examination of production details raises questions.<\/p>\n<p>The San Francisco Mint produced half eagles only in January and February of 1913. During that period, the mint delivered a total of 408,000 pieces on the following dates:<strong>[2]<\/strong><\/p>\n<h4>Date and Value<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Jan 18 \u2014 $300,000<\/li>\n<li>Jan 20 \u2014 $240,000<\/li>\n<li>Jan 22 \u2014 $300,000<\/li>\n<li>Jan 29 \u2014 $320,000<\/li>\n<li>Jan 31 \u2014 $280,000<\/li>\n<li>Feb 13 \u2014 $320,000<\/li>\n<li>Feb 14 \u2014 $280,000<\/li>\n<li>TOTAL: $2,040,000<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Although the mint used several mintmark locations and orientations in 1913, nearly all examples display similar defects. This consistency weakens the die deterioration theory, since it would require multiple dies to deteriorate in precisely the same area.<\/p>\n<h3>Mint Records Provide New Evidence<\/h3>\n<p>Fortunately, researchers no longer need to rely solely on observation. Advances in archival document digitization, transcription, and research methodology now provide access to primary evidence that addresses this puzzle directly.<\/p>\n<h3>Special Assay Coins and the Mint Bureau Process<\/h3>\n<p>At the time, each mint routinely sent two or three sample coins from every delivery to Mint Bureau headquarters in Washington, D.C. Officials referred to these pieces as \u201cSpecial Assay\u201d coins.<\/p>\n<p>The assay lab weighed, examined, and tested the coins to confirm compliance with legal specifications, then reported its findings to both the mint director\u2019s office and the originating mint. When unusual circumstances arose, the Bureau\u2019s Assayer forwarded one of the Special Assay coins to the Philadelphia Mint so Engraver Charles Barber could examine it.<\/p>\n<h3>The January 1913 Discovery<\/h3>\n<p>Such a circumstance arose when the Mint Bureau received Special Assay coins from San Francisco\u2019s Delivery No. 3, dated January 18, 1913.<strong>[3]<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Although the coins passed all routine tests, <strong>Assayer Frederick P. Dewey<\/strong> noticed that the \u201cS\u201d mintmarks appeared barely legible. He immediately brought this problem to the attention of <strong>Director George Roberts<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Roberts responded by sending a fragment of one coin to San Francisco and forwarding a complete coin to Philadelphia for examination.<\/p>\n<p><span><em>\u201cI enclose part of a San Francisco coin and would direct your attention to the extreme obscurity of the mint mark and would be glad to have you explain the cause of this defect. The corresponding coin from the same delivery showed the same defect.\u201d<\/em><\/span><strong>[4]<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3>The Milling Machine Explanation<\/h3>\n<p>Within a few days, Dewey received an explanation from Engraver Barber and forwarded it to <strong>Superintendent Leach<\/strong>. Unfortunately, no copy of Barber\u2019s explanation has been located.<\/p>\n<p><em><span>\u201cI enclose herewith part of one of the special assay coins representing Delivery No. 3 on which the mint mark is very indistinct. This piece has already been submitted to the Philadelphia Mint for examination and I enclose copy of their report. The second assay coin was even worse than this one.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><span>Please return the piece of coin after you have finished your examination, and report upon it.\u201d<\/span><\/em><strong>[5]<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>On February 19, <strong>Superintendent Leach<\/strong> wrote directly <strong>to Director Roberts<\/strong> and explained the cause:<\/p>\n<p><em><span>\u201cIn reply to your letter of February 12th, in relation to the indistinctness of the mint mark on the special assay coin of half eagles, I would say that this defect was noted in our press room; and the cause of the trouble was hard to locate.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><span>Finally it was found that the indistinctness was caused by a defect in the milling machine which failed to set up the edge of the planchet uniformly.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><span>As the indistinctness of the mint mark was the only defect in the impression on the blank it was not thought of sufficient importance to condemn the work.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><span>The authorities of the Mint at Philadelphia are in error as to the cause of the defect.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><span>I return herewith the piece of coin you sent to us for examination.\u201d<\/span><\/em><strong>[6]<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3>How Many Coins Were Affected?<\/h3>\n<p>Unfortunately, Leach did not describe the specific defect in the milling machine. Nevertheless, the position of the mintmark provides an important clue. Because the mintmark lies closest to the edge, its relief depends on how the \u201cS\u201d punch was set when the die was prepared.<\/p>\n<p>In addition, the absence of a fully defined rim may have interfered with proper metal flow during striking. Among U.S. Mint machinery, the milling, or \u201cupsetting\u201d, machine remains the least documented in terms of operation, repair, and maintenance.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, the phrase <span><em>\u201cfailed to set up the edge of the planchet uniformly\u201d<\/em><\/span> offers limited technical guidance. Because planchets entered the press in random orientations, the lack of uniformity must have affected the entire circumference rather than isolated areas.<\/p>\n<p>When half eagle deliveries, correspondence dates, shipping intervals, and assay timing are considered together, it becomes likely that all January deliveries produced defective mintmarks.<\/p>\n<p>In contrast, the $600,000 (120,000 pieces) struck in February appear to represent the primary source of examples with clearly defined \u201cS\u201d mintmarks.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, collectors should expect roughly two-thirds of all 1913-S half eagles to exhibit defective mintmarks.<\/p>\n<h3>Acceptance at the Mint\u2014and the End of the Issue<\/h3>\n<p>Ultimately, regardless of the precise mechanical cause, Superintendent Leach and Coiner William Cutter accepted the coins as satisfactory.<strong>[7]<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>As Leach stated:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em><span>\u201c\u2026As the indistinctness of the mint mark was the only defect in the impression on the blank it was not thought of sufficient importance to condemn the work.\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Director Roberts then sent a copy of the San Francisco explanation to the Philadelphia Mint, which effectively concluded the matter of the \u201cblob\u201d mintmarks.<strong>[8]<\/strong><\/p>\n<h5>By<br \/>\n<strong>Roger W. Burdette<\/strong><br \/>\n<span>Copyright 2025. All rights reserved.<\/span><\/h5>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span><strong>Citations<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<div><strong><span>[1]<\/span><\/strong> US Coin FUN Signature Auction \u2013 Orlando Auction #1181 \/ Lot #5888. Heritage Auctions January 9-14, 2013.<br \/>\n<strong><span>[2]<\/span><\/strong> RG104 Entry 273. San Francisco Mint deliveries by date and denomination, 1913.<br \/>\n<strong><span>[3]<\/span><\/strong> Deliveries were numbered in date order, often segregated by metal. For 1913 there were deliveries of double eagles on January 8 and 10. These would have been gold coin deliveries number 1 and 2.<br \/>\n<strong><span>[4]<\/span><\/strong> RG104 Entry 235 Vol 400. Letter dated February 7, 1913 to Frank Leach from Roberts.<br \/>\n<strong><span>[5]<\/span><\/strong> RG104 Entry 235 Vol 400. Letter dated February 12, 1913 to Frank Leach from Dewey.<br \/>\n<strong><span>[6]<\/span><\/strong> RG104 Entry 235 Vol 400. Letter dated February 19, 1913 to Roberts from Leach.<br \/>\n<strong><span>[7]<\/span><\/strong> In 1912 the position of \u201cCoiner\u201d was replaced by \u201cSuperintendent of the Coining Department.\u201d This placed direct control of coining under the Superintendent; the once powerful Chief Coiner was now just another employee.<br \/>\n<strong><span>[8]<\/span><\/strong> RG104 Entry 235 Vol 400. Letter dated February 26, 1913 to Superintendent Landis from Roberts.<\/div>\n<p>The post <a href=\"https:\/\/coinweek.com\/the-mystery-of-the-blob-mintmark-on-the-1913-s-indian-head-half-eagle\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">The Mystery of the \u201cBlob\u201d Mintmark on the 1913-S Indian Head Half Eagle<\/a> appeared first on <a href=\"https:\/\/coinweek.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">CoinWeek: Rare Coin, Currency, and Bullion News for Collectors<\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Roger W. Burdette for CoinWeek Collectors of Indian Head half eagles cherish a quintet of San Francisco Mint coins for their overall rarity. These issues include the 1909-S, 1910-S, 1911-S, 1912-S, and 1913-S. The San Francisco Mint struck all five dates in limited quantities and promptly issued them to California and other West Coast [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38032","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-finance"],"publishpress_future_action":{"enabled":false,"date":"2026-10-25 16:25:02","action":"change-status","newStatus":"draft","terms":[],"taxonomy":"category","extraData":[]},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gpnewswire.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38032","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gpnewswire.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gpnewswire.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gpnewswire.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gpnewswire.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38032"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gpnewswire.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38032\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gpnewswire.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38032"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gpnewswire.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38032"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gpnewswire.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38032"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}